|
|
|||||||||||||||
Summary
of the POET September meeting April,
2-3 2001 Bremen Attended
the meeting: Stig
Dalsoren, University of Oslo ( stigbd@geofysikk.uio.no) Frode
Stordal, NILU (frode.stordal@nilu.no) John
Burrows, University of Bremen (john.burrows@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Andreas
Richter, University of Bremen (andreas.richter@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Sixten
Fietkan (dietkan@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Thomas
Medeke (medeke@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Hendrik
Nuess (hendrik.nuess@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Astrid Bracher (bracher@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Lars
Hild (hild@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de) Nick
Savage, University of Cambridge (nick.savage@atm.ch.cam.ac.uk) Valerie
Gros (vgros@mpch-mainz.mpg.de) Jos
Olivier, RIVM (jos.olivier@rivm.nl) Jean-François
Müller (jfm@oma.be) Jenny
Stavrakou (jenny@oma.be) Paul Monks (p.s.monks@le.ac.uk) Rainer Steinbrecher (steinbrecher@ifu.fhg.de) Juliette
Hadji-Lazaro, IPSL (juliette.hadji-lazaro@aero.jussieu.fr) Claire
Granier, IPSL (clg@aero.jussieu.fr) The
meeting started at 1:00 p.m. on April, 2nd and finished around 4:00
p.m. on April, 3rd. We met the first afternoon with the coordinators
of the projects which are part of our EU clusters. Everybody liked the very
interesting discussions we have between the different projects, and we plan to
continue to have meetings with these other projects during our next POET
meetings. EU
cluster: Rainer
Steinbrecher, Paul Monks and Frode Stordal gave overviews of the TROTREP,
FUTURE_VOC and SUB-AERO projects, wihich are part of the same EU clusters as
POET. TROTREP: Paul
Monks from the University of Leicester is the coordinator of TROTREP :
Tropospheric ozone and precursors, trends, budget and policy. Coordinator :
P. Monks, Univ. Leicester,
UK Participants :
Univ. Berne, IVL Gothenburg, TNO Apeldoorn, Norwegian Meteo Oslo, NILU, Univ.
Utrecht The
goals of TROTREP are to evaluate/validate and predict the effectiveness of past
and future EU policies. The project will look at how much ozone change is due to
abatement measures in the past and how much more current and future changes will
impact ozone. The
project consists of an integrated measurement and modeling approach, through the
collection and detailed analysis of observational data, as well as through the
analysis of model results. The project will also look at the origin of the
trends in ozone and its precursors over the past 100 years. The
seasonal cycles of ozone and its precursors will be studied, using 2-D
trajectories for the 1988-1996 period for about 70 sites. The impact of NOx and
VOCs emissions will be evaluated. Paul
described the space-state model developed by the University of Berne, which will
be used in the project (Schuepbach et al., 2001, in press). He also gave details
on the FREETEX campaign, which aims at quantifying the role of the in situ
photochemistry versus long-range transport in the control of ozone in the free
troposphere. FUTURE_VOC Rainer Steinbrecher from the IFU in Garmisch is
the coordinator of FUTURE-VOC project. The goal of the project is the study of
the volatile organic compound emissions (VOC) of European forests under future
CO2 levels, and more particularly to study the carbon metabolism of plants and
its effect on the potential volatile organic compound emission in an elevated
CO2 atmosphere. The participants to the project are
the University of Basel, the CNR in Rome, the Instituto Miglioramento
Genetico Alberi forestali Firenze, and the Lancaster University. Rainer
described the current field (Mediterranean area and the Swiss canopy crane) and
chamber experiments under way within the group, and described how the VOC
emission measurements are performed to account for an elevated CO2 level in the
background atmosphere. He described the different chemical species which are
emitted by the major forests forming trees at different spatial and temporal
scales. The first
observations collected by the group seem to show that emissions of species such
as isoprene and terpenes do not show a significant change under higher CO2
levels. But Rainer reminded us that it is expected that future forested areas
may contain more emitting biomass than current forests leading to an increased
biogenic VOC emission per ground area in an future environment. A
Gordon Conference on biogenic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere will take place in
2002 in the UK. Informations on this meeting can be obtained from Rainer. SUB-AERO :
This
project, which concerns the study of subgrid scale investigations of factors
determining the occurrence of ozone and fine particles is coordinated by K.
Lazaridis from NILU. The main objectives of the project are to study the
characteristics of the distributions of photochemical gases and fine particles
in summer and winter from ground-based and ship-based observations platforms. The
Participants are the University of Athens, the NCSR Demokritos Athens, the
University of Essex, the Academy of
Sciences Czech. Republic, and the JRC Ispra. SOGE: Frode
presented an overview of this project, which deals with a System for
Observations of Greenhouse gases in Europe. The project has started in December
2000, and Frode is the coordinator. During
the project, high resolution measurements of CFCs and HFCFs gases will be
performed, and they will be analyzed using the Oslo model. 1st
yearly POET report The
1st yearly report on POET activities is due April, 30 2001. A
few groups have sent their workpackages report in March, which have been
included in the first draft of the report that was distributed during the Bremen
meeting. The
details of the different parts of the report were discussed. The groups who have
not sent their contributions should send them not later than April, 17th
to Claire. All groups should also, if they have not done it, send to Claire the
names of all conferences attended by people working on POET in their groups,
plus a list of publications (referred or not). The
cost statements for each groups need to be provided by April, 26th to
Claire (signed, please!!). Workpackage
1: Distribution of ozone precursors from satellite data Andreas
presented the currently available data concerning tropospheric columns as
observed by GOME since 1996. He showed the average NO2 tropospheric columns from
1996 to 2000, discussed some regional features corresponding to anthropogenic
emissions, lightning and biomass burning emissions. For example, he showed very
good correlations between elevated CO levels in the tropics and fire locations
observed from space. Andreas
discussed uncertainties associated with the treatment of clouds and correction
algorithms. He discussed new methods using different wavelengths regions that
shoe promising results. He showed also results concerning formaldehyde, and
showed strong CH2O maxima in regions where high isoprene emissions are expected,
as well as during biomass burning events. He also presented indications for
enhanced CH2O levels above snow and ice in polar latitudes. People
who would like to have access to the data should contact Andreas Richter.
Juliette
gave an update of the retrieval of CO tropospheric columns from IMG, which
provides satellite observations of the tropospheric columns of O3, CH4 and CO.
She gave details on the retrieval algorithm, and its most recent updates. The
data for the June 16-19 1997 period have been published. Data for April 1997 are
also ready. The retrieval of ozone tropospheric columns for June 1997 is in
progress, and the retrieval of methane should start in a few months. We
will ask Cathy to provide the CO IMG weighting functions, so that the models can
be compared more accurately with the satellite observations.
Workpackage
2: Emission inventories Jos
gave an introduction on the regulations decided within the Kyoto Protocol, and
within the UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change).
Countries who have signed the UNFCCC (most) have agreed to report their
emissions annually, and to report their national policies every 3-4 years. Jos
gave details on the agreements signed by the countries on emissions limitations
for the coming years. The
countries have agreed to report their emissions under a common format, and they
report their emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O + f-gases, CO, NOx, NMVOCs, SO2 from
1990 onwards, and by IPCC source categories. Each
country uses its own method to calculate the emissions, which leads to rather
significant uncertainties. Some countries also report only their anthropogenic
emissions, some other report all anthropogenic+natural emissions. Jos
gave a presentation of the current status of the version 3 of the EDGAR
inventory for anthropogenic emissions. The 1990 emissions totals have been
revised, some categories have been added, emission factors have been updated The
inventories by large areas of the world are available since January. The gridded
inventories will be available over the next few weeks. Claire
has used the 1995 emissions available for large areas of the world to update the
EDGAR v2.0 that were used in most
models. These updated emissions are available in the zardoz data base (for those
who have signed the data protocol!), an a description of all the elements of
this emissions data base has been sent to everybody in February by email. Jos
also gave indications on the changes of anthropogenic emissions for some species
from 1970 to 1995. He also gave some indications on the strong seasonality of
some emissions such as emissions from fuel consumption. He also mentioned the
overview of IGAC inventories that was published in the December 2000 issue of
the IGAC newsletter. The
full set of Edgar v3 files at a 1x1 degree resolution will be ready around
April, 15th. Jos will send them to Claire, who will put them in the
same format as the emissions files currently on zardoz. Claire will send a POET/TROTREP
email when the files are available. Workpackage
3: Intercomparison of CTMs 4
models are participating in POET: TOMCAT from Cambridge, OSLO-CTM2 from the
University of Oslo, MOZART from CNRS in Paris, and IMAGES from BISA, Brussels. The
models are not yet fully ready for all planned intercomparison exercises, due to
machine changes for some groups or for major improvements in the model. Each
group has however done at least some parts of the planned intercomparisons. Radon
simulation: The simulations have been dome by 3 groups, and the results have
been compared with the results discussed in an earlier comparison (from the
Jacob et al., JGR 1997 paper). The models give very similar results. For a
better view at the results, the groups will send their 300 hPa maps (ASCII
format) for an Jun-Jul-Aug average to Nick, who will make a plot with the same
color/level scale. The Rn zonal average should also be sent to Nick to plot Rn
cross-sections. Nick
has started to convert his model results into the HDF format. He discussed in
details with Bojan about the metadata. He will work over the next few weeks with
Frode, in order to provide fortran codes that can convert ASCII files into the
required HDF format. All groups will then start to convert their output into the
HDF format and send them to the NILU database. Claire
and Jean-Francois have used the emissions data set in the zardoz data base and
run their model. They have started to compare their results. This process will
be made more simple after conversion to HDF. The other model will perform the
same type of simulations over the next few months. We
agreed to save in the NILU data base the following species: O3, CO, OH, HO2,
H2O2, NO, NO2, CH4, CH2O, Aceton, PAN and HNO3. We need to discuss more on the
frequency of the output that will be saved. Most
of us will attend the GEIA/GIM meeting in Paris on June, 18th. We
could propose during this meeting that the POET intercomparison framework (emissions,
meteorology, format, etc.) could be used by other people who would like to
compare their models with the 4 POET participating models. Workpackage
4: Inverse modeling Claire
gave an update of the current work done on inverse modeling. First attempts of
the optimization of CO emissions have been performed, using the IMAGES model,
together with the observations from the CMDL/NOAA network, which provides
observations of surface CO at about 30 surface stations over the past 6-8 years.
The work has been done using the inventory
of surface emissions currently used in the MOZART model, which is detailed in
the http://acd.ucar.edu/models/MOZART/emissions/emissions.html web site ;
the anthropogenic emissions used correspond to the EDGAR v2.0 inventory. Several
assumptions are made in this first step : errors on model results and
observations are known, they are gaussian and independent, and there exist a
linear relationship between CO emission and concentration. In this study, only
direct surface emissions of CO were optimized, which means it was assumed that
the production of CO from hydrocarbons oxidation is well quantified. The
optimization of surface emissions was done over 12 large areas, assuming a fixed
distribution of emissions inside these areas. The
first results show a large deficit in the surface emissions over Asia, that are,
according to the inversion scheme, due to missing emissions from agriculture
waste and fuelwood burning. However, due to the location of most of the CMDL
stations, they are not sensitive to all types of emissions, such as the one from
forest or savanna burning for example. The results that have been obtained need
to be validated and studied in more details. The study has however shown that
more data are needed to obtain better results, and the use of satellite data
such as the ones provided by the IMG instrument will be used. Similar studies
will also soon start, which will use the MOZART model, which allows the used of
analyzed meteorological fields corresponding to the measurement period. The
development of the adjoint of MOZART has just started. The adjoint generator
TAMC will be used for these developments, in collaboration with people from NCAR
(Boulder, USA) and from the Max Planck Institut of Meteorology in Hamburg). During
the next months, a similar method will be developed, for the use of the results
of the MOZART model in which the emissions as developed in WP2 will be used. Workpackage
5: Isotopes Valerie gave an overview of the origin of CO and
CH4 isotopes and of currently available measurements. There are 10
stations measuring CO isotopes. The data from available stations have been
compiled in a single format. The data will be put in the POET database as soon
as the corresponding procedures are defined by the NILU group. Valerie
discussed the uncertainties on the isotopic ratios in different categories of
emissions. -The isotopic ratios are rather well defined for the primary sources
of CO (combustion). However, the fossil combustion source signatures are better
defined as those from biomass burning. For the secondary source of CO (hydrocarbon
oxidation), the isotopic ratio are well defined for d13C(CO) but
there is a large uncertainty concerning d18O(CO). Valerie
gave also a list of recent model studies on CO/CH4 isotopes. Workpackage
6: ozone precursors/OH feedback We
discussed the work we plan for the next months on this topics. The
impact of changes in emissions on ozone concentrations depends on the CO/NOx
ratio. We will look at the impact of uncertainties
on emissions, of the trends in emissions, and on the difference in model
results due to different parameterizations of transport processes. We
will look at trends in atmospheric species, to changes in the HOx budget and the
CH4 lifetime. Workpackage
7: tagging of ozone Claire
has started the tagging of CO, in preparation of the tagging of other ozone
precursors. We will have to discuss and agree over the next few weeks on what we
want to tag. We
also discussed in some details about the tagging of ozone. Nick prepared a few
pages discussing this topics that were distributed to the modelers. We need to
think about it over the next few weeks, and discuss again this topics in Paris
in June. Status
of the Workshop on emissions of chemical species and aerosols : Dates
of the workshop : June 19-22 2001
in Paris All
the details concerning the workshop are on the NILU/POET web site http://nadir.nilu.no.
This includes the goals of the workshop, the abstracts format, and practical
informations. About
85 abstracts have been received, and a preliminary program has been written,
which will be sent shortly to the program committee. After
a discussion, we decided that there will be an oral presentation of the cluster.
We decided a power-point presentation, which will be given by Paul Monks (or
Rainer?) on the 1st day of the workshop. Each project will also make
a poster on the goals/first results of the project. A
reminder to all groups: in order to have enough drinks/pastries, each group
leader should send to Claire the numbers of the people who will attend from the
group.
European
meeting in Torino: We
will submit an abstract for the European meeting The
deadline is May 1st. Next
POET meeting: We
all found that we have very fruitful discussions with our partners from the
other groups in the EU cluster, and we propose to have our next meeting at the
same time as the TROTREP, FUTURE-VOC and SUB-AERO groups if possible. The next
meeting would be over 2 days, the first day being a common meeting
of the cluster, and each group will meet separately on the second day. A
tentative date is November 5-6 2001, in the RIVM/TNO buildings. Jos Olivier will
check if this is possible with the TNO colleagues. |