Summary
of the POET September meeting
September
15, 2000
Cambridge
Attended
the meeting:
Ivar
Isaksen, University of Oslo (ivar.isaksen@geofysikk.uio.no)
Stig
B., University of Oslo (stigbd@geofysikk.uio.no)
Bojan
Bojkov, NILU (bojan.bojkov@nilu.no)
John
Burrows, University of Bremen (john.burrows@gome5.physik.uni-bremen.de)
Nick
Savage, University of Cambridge (nick.savage@atm.ch.cam.ac.uk)
Kathy
Law, University of Cambridge (kathy@atm.ch.cam.ac.uk)
Valerie
Gros (vgros@mpch-mainz.mpg.de)
Jos
Olivier, RIVM (jos.olivier@rivm.nl)
Cathy
Clerbaux (ccl@aero.jussieu.fr)
Claire
Granier (clg@aero.jussieu.fr)
Administrative
issues:
Claire
gave a summary of the meeting which took place in Brussels in June at the
European Commission, which discussed the clustering of POET with other European
projects. POET is now part of a cluster with the TROTREP, FUTURE_VOC and
SUB-AERO projects :
TROTREP :
Tropospheric ozone and precursors, trends, budget and policy.
Coordinator :
P. Monks, Univ. Leicester, UK
Participants :
Univ. Berne, IVL Gothenburg, TNO Apeldoorn, Norwegian Meteo Oslo, NILU, Univ.
Utrecht)
FUTURE_VOC :
BVOC emissions of european forests under future CO2 levels : influence on
compound composition and source strength
Coordinator :
Steinbrecher, FHG Garmich, Germany
Participants :
Univ. Basel, CNR Rome, Instituto Miglioramento Genetico Alberi forestali
Firenze, Lancaster Univ.
SUB-AERO :
Subgrid scale investigations of factors determining the occurrence of ozone and
fine particles
Coordinator :
Lazaridis, NILU, Norway
Participants :
Univ. Athens, NCSR Demokritos Athens, Univ. Essex, Academy of Sciences Czech.
Republic, JRC Ispra.
2
rapporteurs will have to write reports (when ?) for each clusters. The
rapporteurs for this cluster are M. Millan (Spain) and Claire.
-
NOTE : a first detailed yearly report for the POET activities is due April,
30 2001. Claire will send the informations on the report in March 2001, so that
we can start to write.
-
Next meeting : in Bremen April,2 2001. We should complete the yearly report
during the meeting. We would like also to invite the coordinators of the other
projects in our cluster + the coordinator of MOZAIC (à
meeting of 1.5 to 2 days ?)
Workpackage
1: Distribution of ozone precursors from satellite data
John
discussed version 1.0 of the NO2 tropopospheric column data, which are now
available from January 1997 to June 2000. He showed the average NO2 tropospheric
columns and 1997 and 1998, discussed some regional features corresponding to
anthropogenic emissions, lightning and biomass burning emissions.
People
who would like to have access to the data should contact Andreas Richter.
He
discussed the methods used to separate stratospheric and tropospheric ozone, and
how to better take into account the airmass factors, the clouds and the
aerosols. He proposed new approaches, and showed how for example the use of 2
different wavelenghts could improve the overall accuracy of the results.
He
showed also results concerning formaldehyde, tropospheric ozone and SO2.
=
= = = =
Cathy
give an update of the retrieval of CO tropospheric columns from IMG. The data
for the June 16-19 1997 period are ready, together with their accuracy. Data for
April 1997 are also ready. The retrieval of ozone tropospheric columns for June
1997 is in progress, and the retrieval of methane should start in a few months.
Cathy
showed a figure giving a comparison between assimilated CO for June 1997 and the
corresponding surface data from CMDL. The agreement is good, except for the high
southern latitudes, where the CMDL values could be underestimated by about 15%.
Workpackage
2: Emission inventories
Jos
gave a presentation of the current status of the EDGAR inventory of
anthropogenic emissions. The EDGAR v2.0 has been updated, some categories have
been added, emission factors have been updated. The spatial/temporal
distribution of biomass burning has been included. The inventories by country
will be ready at the beginning of October.
Jos
also gave indications on the changes of anthropogenic emissions for some species
from 1970 to 1995. He also gave some indications on the strong seasonality of
some emissions such as emissions from the residential sector.
By
mid-december 2000, the 1995 new Edgar will be available on a 1x1 degree grid.
=
= = =
Jos
and Jean-François discussed prior to the meeting about natural emissions, to
try to agree on an emission database which will be used for the intercomparisons
of the models. A few indications on what they agreed on :
Methane
emissions : Use Matthews and Fung
NOx
from soils: Use the GEIA inventory and scale it to a total emission of 8 Tg
N/yr.
NOx
from lightning : Use Price and Penner distribution and scale it to 4 or 5
Tg N/yr (needs to be decided)
CO from
vegetation : distribution based on the npp, and scaled to a total of 160 Tg
CO/yr.
Soil
sink : proposition JF : vd=0.05*NPPm,
where NPPm = monthly NPP
isoprene :
still need discussion, use GEIA (503 Tg C/yr ?)
terpenes :
from GEIA
=
= = =
Work
within TROTREP
Jos,
who is also part with TROTREP (see at the beginning), showed us what is planed
within TROTREP.
The
history of atnthropogenic emissions from 1970 to 1990 will be determined,
together with the time profiles. There will be sensitivity studies to test how
models are sensitive to the seasonality of emissions, as well as to the altitude
of the emissions.
Workpackage
3: Intercomparison of CTMs
4
models are participating in POET: TOMCAT from Cambridge, OSLO-CTM2 from the
University of Oslo, MOZART from CNRS in Paris, and IMAGES from BISA, Brussels.
The
models are not yet fully ready for the planned intercomparison, but a
preliminary comparison of the model results has been done. Two types of runs
have been done, one simulating the distribution of Radon (emissions as indicated
in the Jacob et al., J.G.R. 1997 paper), and one with a stratospheric tracer,
with an initial condition of 1 in the stratosphere, and 0 in the troposphere in
January, and the distribution of the tracer at the end of March is archived.
Radon
simulation : The IMAGES (average meteorologys), CTM2 (1996 ECMWF) and
MOZART (GCM meteorology) we compared, and we looked at the surface and 300 hPa
distributions in March and July. The distributions were similar, but we need now
to plot them with the same color scale for better comparisons.
Stratospheric
tracer : Only IMAGES and CTM2 runs were performed, and they show rather
different results, with a larger downward transport in IMAGES than in CTM2.
Stig
presented a detailed update of the Oslo-CTM2 model, which will be used for the
intercomparisons.
Discussion
of the future work :
-
In the runs we will perform during the following months, we will all use the
ECMWF analysis for 1997, at 31 levels.
-
We will start to convert our ouput into the HDF format (see below) and send them
to the NILU database.
Radon :
-
We need a more detailed analysis of the maps, looking at regional differences,
at observations of Radon (as in the Jacob et al. Paper)
-
In the yearly report, we will have to state more clearly the objectives of the
intercomparison of these tracers : for example, it is important to test the
convection schemes with the Radon tracer as convection is a very important
process, more particularly over the tropics in the biomass burning areas, which
represent a large source of CO.
-
We should also do the same runs of Radon, without convection from May to
spetember.
-
We should archive time series, in order to be able to calculate standard
deviations
Stratospheric
tracer :
We will perform 4 series of runs, each being 3-month long. Each of the runs will
start on the 1st of January, April, July and October, and archive the
last 10 days of the 3rd month.
Workpackage
4: Inverse modeling
Claire
gave an update of the work done on inverse modeling. This work was performed
using the IMAGES model, and it has focused on the inverse modeling of CO using
the CMDL observations of CO over the past few years. Several asumptions are made
in this first step : errors on model results and observations are known,
they are gaussian and indépendant, and there exist a linear relationship
between CO emission and concentration. In this study, only direct surface
emissions of CO were optimized, which means it was assumed that there is no
error on the production of of CO from hydrocarbons oxidation. The optimization
of surface emissions was done over 12 large areas, assuming a fixed distribution
of emissions inside these areas.
The
first results are very encouraging. During the next months, the results of the
MOZART model will be used, satellite data will be included in the inverse
modeling process.
The
development of the adjoint of MOZART will start soon. The adjoint generator TAMC
will be used for these developments, in collaboration with people from NCAR
(Boulder, USA) and from the Max Planck Institut of Meteorology in Hamburg).
Workpackage
5: Isotopes
Valerie
gave an overview of the origin of CO and CH4 isotopes and of
currently available measurements. There are 10 stations measuring CO isotopes, 3
have stooped making measurements a few years ago. The 7 ongoing stations cover a
latitude range from 28N (or S ?) to 79N.
Measurements
are also available from a few campaigns (INDOEX), from the transiberian
campaigns (TROICA : 1992, 1997 and 1999), from the 25 flights from
1997-2000 within the CARIBIC project (flights from Germany to the Maldives).
Other institutes have also some surface data, like at the Barbados, and some
aircraft are also available.
Valerie
gave also a list of recent model studies on CO/CH4 isotopes.
The
data will be included in the POET database soon.
Workpackage
7: tagging of ozone
We
talked quite a bit about the ozone coloring, as we have not been able to solve
the most difficult problem : How do we deal with the recycling of species.
Coloring
of ozone : rather straightforwars, as sources of ozone precursors from the
stratosphere are almost negligible.
We discussed several possibilities :
1.
tagging of ozone precursors : NOx, CO, CH4 and other HCs. This step
is necessary, and we should start with this during the coming months. We will
have to agree on what we want to tag (area, type of emission, ..)
Nick will propose a list of source areas and processes so that we can start this
agging.
2.
Use families such as Ox and NOx in order to reduce the difficulties
caused by the cycling of species. This may mean different models with different
approaches.
3.
Consider the regions one at a time to reduce demands on memory.
4.
Use of budget code with tagging of precursors (Cambridge)
5.
Multiple origin problems (for example, one anthropogenic NOx reacting
with a natural RO2). Possibilities :
a)
split ozone 50/50 between categories
b)
create
N2 number of regions (N=number of regions or type of emission)
c)
consider that, for exmaple,
ozone coming from one european NO2 + one asian RO2 is the same ozone as one
asian NO2 + one european RO2.
The
POET database :
The
location of the data base at NILU is zardoz.nilu.no (IP : 128.39.104.1)
POET
directory tree : /nadir/projects/other/poet
To
access the data in the database, we need to sign the data protocol.
The
data protocol will be sent to all people in the POET email list (in the
attached file).
The
access will be retricted, we have to think about what we do with people in the
same cluster.
Bojan gave a presentation of the new Nadir data base :
-
Strict metadata guidelines
-
Model data will have to be defined correctly
-
HDF 4.1 r3 format
-
Inventory through a relational database
HDF
format : information (freeware) at :
http ://hdf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/hdf4.html
or
through nadir.nilu.no/calval
HDF
is a binary format, platform indépendant, and there is a suite of tools
available.
Informations on metadocuments :
nadir.nilu.no/calval/documents.htm
We have to start to transfer our archive into HDF and into the POET database.
Workshop
on emissions of chemical species and aerosols :
Dates
of the workshop : June 19-22 2001 in Paris
We
discussed and improved the preliminary program : there is now a full day
concerning available observations and their use for a better quantification of
emissions. A first circular has been sent to the non-POET people to have an idea
about the number of people who might be interested, and a call for abstracts
will be released in December, for a submission deadline of March, 31st.
|